Why Extending the Home Buyer Tax Credit Closing Deadline Makes Sense

It looks like a deal might be in the works to extend the closing deadline for the Home Buyer Tax Credit.  Multiple sources reported that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid expressed his support for an extension, and had some bipartisan support.  Although it’s not a sure thing, especially since any extension is going to be tacked on as an amendment to a fairly controversial jobs bill, it’s certainly good news to know that a number of Senators have publicly backed the extension.

As we argued earlier this week, an extension would be a good thing:

  1. It’s simply not possible to close the number of deals that went into contract in the past few months by the June 30th deadline. The real estate settlement  industry — lenders, settlement agents, attorneys — are simply not equipped to close the number of deals that are in the pipeline by the June 30th deadline.  They don’t have the personnel, and no one is going to hire and train a bunch of new employees to handle what will be a short-term staffing problem.  Moreover, transactions generally have taken longer to close in the past year or so anyway, simply because of tighter lending guidelines and requirements and the prevalence of foreclosure and short-sale purchases that require longer approval times. (Diana Olick’s excellent Reality Check housing blog on CNBC reports that Reid actually cited the short sale issue as the driving factor for the decision).
  2. This means that a lot of buyers who legitimately played by the rules will be unable to claim the credit unless the deadline is expected. This won’t be through any fault of their own, just the reality that going from contract to closing takes longer than it used to.  These people did everything they need to do to claim the credit, but they’ll be victims of the overload on the industry if they don’t get an extension.
  3. Finally, the extension won’t dramatically change the expected cost of the Home Buyer Tax Credit. When Congress scored (i.e., estimated the cost) the bill, they assumed that people who got into contract would be able to close within the two months between the contract deadline of April 30 and the closing deadline of June 30th.  But the credit did not really generate the business we all expected until April, with buyers basically waiting to the last minute.  Now, all those under-the-wire buyers have created a huge pipeline of transactions in such a short time that they cannot possibly all close by the deadline.  But it doesn’t seem to be more transactions overall than anyone expected when they priced out the bill, so extending the closing deadline will not dramatically increase the cost to the Treasury.

Note that no one is discussing re-opening the eligibility for the tax credit — that is, the April 30 deadline for going into contract is almost certainly to stay in place as a cutoff for eligibility.  All that’s being discussed is giving buyers more time to close their transactions.

We’ll keep you posted.

Last Minute Advice for Making the June 30th Home Buyer Tax Credit Closing Deadline

I was interviewed last week by Amy Hoak of the Wall Street Journal Marketwatch about the looming deadlines for the Home Buyer Tax Credit.  As you know, eligible buyers must be closed by June 30th in order to claim the credit.  Her article is a terrific overview, so I recommend you take a look at it.

We’ve written about this issue before in this space, but we wanted to review some of the finer points of making sure you can get closed by June 30th.

The biggest problem home buyers are going to face is simply the difficult in creating a sense of urgency in the industry professionals involved.  Why?  Because in the vast majority of real estate closings, the parties do not have a “hard” deadline for closing.  In fact, most industry pros are used to last-minute delays in closings, which are generally not a big deal.  If we can’t close on Tuesday, we’ll close on Thursday; if not this week, we can close next week.  Most real estate contracts have a closing date stated in the contract, but that date is an “on or about” date and is generally subject to extension for any reason.

So most real estate professionals – lenders, real estate agents, title closers, settlement agents, attorneys, etc. – are not used to dealing with a hard deadline. They have a mindset that “close to” the date is good enough.  In this case, though, it’s not good enough.  If you’re not closed by June 30th, you don’t get the credit.

In talking with Amy, I came up with a list of the types of things that could delay your closing:

  • Communication of Urgency.  Can’t stress this enough.  Make sure EVERYONE involved in the transaction knows you have to close by June 30th.  Ensure they make your closing a priority.

 

  • Lender Documentation. Since the biggest source of last-minute closing delays come from lender requests, contact your mortgage lender and brainstorm about any potential documents or information they might need to get you clear to close.  Ask what kinds of things come up at the last minute, to get you a head start on tracking them down.

 

  • Late Review of Title Reports. Make sure your attorney or settlement agent reviews your title report as soon as possible.  Usually, a title report is ordered around the time of contract signing, and is produced within a few weeks afterwards, but in a lot of cases the attorney or settlement agent won’t review that report until the week of the closing.  Make sure your attorney or settlement reviews the title as soon as it comes in, in case a problem crops up.  Those problems can usually be resolved, but they take time.

 

  • Open Permits.  A major stumbling block to closing comes when the seller turns out to have done some work on the home without completing a final engineering inspection and closing out building permits.  This might be a deck, a bathroom, or any other remodeling project.  Usually, it’s not illegal work, just work that was done legally, but no one bothered to file the final paperwork.  Not a problem, unless you discover it on June 28th, the day before your closing.

 

  • Short sales.  In some areas of the country, almost half of the transactions involve short sales, which essentially require approval not of the seller but of the bank that has to approve taking a short on the mortgage.  Getting approval for short sales has become easier in the past year or so, and particularly in the last six months, but bank loan mitigation departments are not necessarily responsive to requests to close on particular dates unless the parties in the transaction are very aggressive and competent in responding to bank requests.  This is particularly troublesome because the seller is the one in the relationship with the bank, not the buyer, and a lot of sellers in those situations have a low level of urgency since they are not getting any equity out of the transaction.  It’s even tougher dealing with banks than with sellers if you’re trying to get a deal closed by the deadline.

 

  • Last minute judgments.  Sellers who are in some sort of distress often have stopped paying their mortgage as well as some other debts, and it is not unusual for creditors to put last-minute liens on a property between the time of the initial title search and the “continuation search” that is conducted on the eve of the closing. For example, sellers in short sale situations might get approval for the short from the bank, only to discover the day before the closing that a creditor has put another judgment lien on the property that now requires a re-negotiation of the terms.

 

  • Verification of Employment.  The biggest last minute hold up is verification of current employment, which can’t be done until the loan is cleared to close (i.e., the bank wants to verify employment right at the last minute, before the loan is issued).  So make sure you can get that verification, and that your employer is available to give it, within the few days prior to your closing.

 

  • PMI approval.  If you are getting PMI, you’ll need to be aware that PMI companies don’t give approval until the first mortgage bank clears the file, so PMI approval necessarily comes at the last minute.

 

  • Last minute credit documentation.  A lot of times, the lender needs last-minute credit reports, pay stubs, and other credit documents.  Lenders usually run credit and collect credit documents when they take the loan, but those documents are only good for about 60-90 days.  Given how long it generally takes to close, by the time of the closing, those documents might be considered out of date, and new credit reports (and new bank statements, and new pay stubs) have to be collected. 

 

  • Credit Impact. Another delay can be caused if the buyer has done something in the past few months, since they made the application, that affects their credit rating (such as buy a car, open a new credit line, anything at all).  Most lenders caution buyers to be very careful about doing anything that might affect credit, but that last-minute credit check might show a change in credit status that can delay (or kill) a loan.

 

We hope this helps.  Good luck!

Should the Home Buyer Tax Credit Closing Deadline Be Extended?

The Wall Street Journal reported this week that the National Association of Realtors is pushing for an extension of the June 30th Home Buyer Tax Credit closing deadline in order to ensure that otherwise eligible home buyers are able to claim their credit.

This is absolutely a good idea, and Congress should indeed extend the deadline.  This has nothing to do with enlarging the pool of eligible home buyers, since the contract deadline has already passed. Rather, it’s simply a recognition of the difficulty many qualified home buyers are going to face in getting closed by the end of the month.

Anyone in the real estate business can tell you about the challenges in meeting a closing deadline, and the potential last minute hiccups that can derail a closing.  Most significantly, very few real estate transactions involve a “hard” deadline in which the parties absolutely HAVE to close by a particular date. Although parties can insist on a “time of the essence” clause in a contract to require closing on a particular date, few people actually utilize such clauses. 

Why?  Because the ability to meet a closing deadline is usually out of the hands of most buyers and sellers. Instead, your ability to meet a closing deadline can depend on last minute lender requirements (“oh, we now need your paystubs from 2005…”) or late-discovered problems with the title (last minute liens placed on the property, open building permits).  Usually, these are not problems that buyers and sellers can anticipate.

Moreover, in the market we’ve had over the past few years, a large percentage of home sales involve short sales, in which the seller is not really the determining factor anyway.  Instead, there’s a loan mitigation department at the owner’s mortgage bank that has to decide whether to give final approval to a sale that will leave the bank short.

Finally, I would love to see an extension of the credit simply to take the pressure off the industry. The June 30th deadline is certainly a lot better than the November 30th deadline from last year, which would have fallen on the Monday after Thanksgiving and ruined a lot of holidays.  But any summer deadline is going to be complicated by vacations, particularly by the fact that the Independence Day holiday is but a few days after the deadline.  It would be nice if people in the real estate industry who will be consumed with getting deals closed by June 30th could get a break, and be able to maybe take a vacation.  That might be a little self-serving, but everyone is better off if the industry can close this huge pipeline of transactions in an orderly process over the next few months.

Did the Home Buyer Tax Credit Help the Market?

Nick Timiraos of The Wall Street Journal Developments Blog wrote a piece last week noting that the Home Buyer Tax Credit might have actually had the effect of spurring home sales and helping the housing market rejuvenate. He notes that seasonally adjusted existing home sales were up 7.6% in April compared to March, and that new home sales were up a seasonally adjusted 14.8% from March to April.

This is fairly consistent with what we saw on the street, in our market of the Hudson Valley in New York State.  We saw a literal explosion of activity in April, with our company having by far the biggest month in our history for new transactions in contract.  Moreover, the overall market seemed to jump as well, with increases of about 50% from last year in most of the counties we service.

The question now becomes whether the increase in home sales was simply a reallocation of sales from the summer to the spring – that is, did the tax credit pull transactions that would have taken place in the summer, or did it actually create transactions that otherwise would not have existed?  My take on this is that most of the increase was simply a reallocation, but the fact that the market was up in some of our higher priced counties indicates that the overall market did experience a lift.  For example, we service Westchester County, where the median sales price of almost $600,000 is beyond the reach of most qualifying tax credit buyers; nevertheless, sales were up 59% from the previous April. The tax credit cannot account for that kind of increase in a higher priced county. 

That said, as I write this, we’re definitely experiencing a relatively slow May.  Whether that’s because agents and buyers are simply exhausted from the rigorous activity of April, and focused now on getting this large pipeline of open transactions to the closing table by the end of June, or whether it’s a sign that the market is going to slow through the summer, remains to be seen.

Getting Closed by June 30th — the Hard Deadline

Okay, the tax credit boom is over, with April 30th slamming shut the window for prospective purchasers to get into contract.  We saw an enormous boom in business in April as the credit wound down — at our real estate company, we had the biggest month in the 25-year history of the company, transacting three times the number of homes as April 2009.  We expect that companies across the country had the same types of results.

Now, the question becomes what you need to do to get closed by June 30th if you want to claim the credit.  One of the complications of all this is that real estate agents, at least in my area, are simply not used to juggling this many open (i.e., in contract) transactions and trying to get them all closed at once.  Five years ago, they were more practiced at that, but most of them have not had the luxury of having multiple deals at a time during the slowdown in the market.  So let’s make sure these contracts get to closing on time.

Here’s what you need to do:

  1. Communicate your situation. Make sure that everyone on your team — your agent, lender, attorney/escrow agent, engineer, and even the seller knows about your June 30th deadline.  I would send out a blast email to everyone reminding them of everything that needs to be done by that time, and making sure they know you’re on a true hard deadline.
  2. Get Organized. Take out a piece of paper.  Write down everything that has to be done to get you to close.  Indeed, call all your professionals helping you and ask what they need to do, and when they need to do it, to get you to close.  I’m a big believer in “checklists” as a means of ensuring attention to detail.  This is the perfect time to execute a checklist of all the things that you need to do to get closed.  Turn your checklist into a project plan that you’ll send to each of your professionals, and then stay on top of them to make sure they’re complying.
  3. Give yourself wiggle room.  Don’t plan a closing the last two weeks of June.  Try to schedule before that, so that you don’t end up losing your tax credit due to a last minute screwup.  No matter how prepared you are, you’re going to run into problems somewhere along the line.  So give yourself wiggle room

One way to avoid those types of last minute problems is to ask each of your professionals to identify things that could go wrong, so that you’re aware of them.  If there are documents that sometimes are required at the last minute, go get them now.  For example, it’s a great idea to gather all those old pay stubs, contact info for past employers, and everything else that your lender might be asking from you at the last minute.

If anyone else has other suggestions, I’d love to hear them.

Last week for the Home Buyer Tax Credit: What does it mean to get into “Contract”

With the impending expiration of the Home Buyer Tax Credit, we had a few questions this week about what it means to be “in contract” for purposes of eligibility for the credit. The legislation revised in November requires that eligible home buyer be in contract by April 30, and closed by June 30th, which was actually the first time that Congress put a dual-deadline approach to the credit.

That is, in previous versions of the credit, Congress only set out a closing deadline, which is a much easier demarcation.  Everyone knows what it means to be “closed,” particularly because a “closing” is a fairly formal procedure involving all sorts of legal documents, including bank documents.  As such, it’s very difficult to “fake” a closing date to purposes of claiming a tax credit to which you’re not entitled — you would need not only your settlement service (and attorneys) to be on board, but you’d also need the banks to sign off on loan documents with an inaccurate date.  Good luck with that — another word for changing dates on a federally insured loan document is fraud, and it’s a good way to end up in jail.

But the question now becomes what constitutes a “contract” for purposes of the tax credit, and whether the IRS has any rules about what a “contract” means.  In some parts of the country, buyers make offers on properties through their agents, and sign a “purchase offer” that is akin to a contract, particularly if that offer is then signed by the seller.  That signed document might then be submitted to attorneys, or it might actually be the formal contract of sale.  In other parts of the country (such as downstate New York), agents simply present informal offers, which are then turned into a binding contract of sale prepared by attorneys.

So we expect that in parts of the country that do agent contracts, buyers are going to be able to claim the credit right up to the Friday deadline.  In other parts of the country, such as where we have our brokerage in the Hudson Valley of New York State, buyers might have difficulty getting into contract by Friday if they don’t already have attorneys working on them.  For buyers in those areas, we would suggest that they use a signed purchase offer as the “contract,” since a signed agreement with the sellers, even if it is subject to attorney approval, would probably satisfy the IRS requirement of a contract by April 30th.

Confirmation that the Marriage Penalty in the Home Buyer Tax Credit will not apply to married couples with one spouse on title.

Today, we received further confirmation and clarification from the IRS that the Marriage Penalty in the Home Buyer Tax Credit will not prevent a married couple from claiming the credit in cases where one spouse is on title, but the other spouse is not. As you might remember, we were concerned that the IRS would literally read the language of the tax credit legislation to require that both spouses trying to claim the long-time homeowner tax credit had to be actual owners (i.e., on the title) for the couple to be eligible for the credit.  We spoke to an IRS representative last week about that issue, and he stated (as we had hoped) that ownership would be imputed from the titled spouse to the un-titled spouse, and that a married couple who had lived in the home that one of the spouses owned for at least five consecutive years out of the last eight (and otherwise qualified for the tax credit) would be eligible.

I got further confirmation on that issue today from a Ms. Burchette, ID # 0246491 of the IRS hotline, who actually indicated that the IRS has released an internal advisory (probably in response to our raising of this issue last week) stating the following: “A married couple are both considered owners of the home even if only one spouse is a titled owner when both have been residing in it.”  So although that advisory has not been published, the IRS is using it internally, confirming the information we put out last week.

But the reason I was on the phone today with the IRS was that we had a new series of related questions come up that in our Questions section, from multiple readers who were concerned about what happens if the couple has lived in the home for a long time together, and one of them is on the title, but they were only recently married:

  • From Matt: Wife and I moved into our current home 5 1/2 years ago (fall of 04)and has been our only principle residence in that time period. When we bought the house in 04 it was in my name only. We married in January of 2008 and refinanced adding my wife’s name to the title in December 2008. We have a sales contract currently in place and are closing in June. I would like to think we meet all the criteria as we have both lived in this house for five years, but would like your opinion.
  • From Katie: My husband bought a house in 2003 before we were married. I had never purchased a home. I lived there for 5 years, 4 of which we were married before we bought a new house together in mid-Nov 2009. Does your recent clarification, mean that we specifically had to have been married for 5 years as well to qualify?
  • From K: My husband and I have lived in the same home for five years. He is the sole owner of the home. Marraige according to the IRS imputes ownership to me. My question is: does the ownership imputed to me run from the date of purchase or the date of marriage? We lived together in the home for the first year while engaged.

In other words, will the IRS impute ownership to a non-title spouse where the spouse has lived in the home for at least five consecutive years out of the last eight that the other spouse owned, but where the couple was not married during that whole time? You could imagine a situation where the IRS will only “impute” ownership during the time that the couple was married, and bar married couples from claiming the credit where only one spouse was on title, and the couple was not BOTH married AND living in that home for the requisite five year period.

Fortunately, the answer seems to be that such couples will in fact be eligible for the Home Buyer Tax Credit. According to Ms. Burchette, the key fact is that they must have both lived in that home for five consecutive years.  If they did that, and one of them owned the home, the IRS will consider the ownership to be imputed to the non-titled spouse so long as they are CURRENTLY married.  They do NOT need to be married for the entire time of their ownership.

Obviously, this is good news.  It’s become fairly common for couples to live together before they get married, and it’s not difficult to imagine situations where couples get married after one spouse has purchased a home that they both lived in.  So we’re glad that the IRS is taking a common-sense approach to this issue.