UPDATE April 13, 2010: This post references a “Fourth Type” of Marriage Penalty questioning whether a married couple would qualify for the Home Buyer Tax Credit in situations where the couple has lived in a home for the requisite five-consecutive-years-out-of-eight period but only one spouse is on the title to the property. The IRS has now confirmed for us that in those situations, ownership by one spouse would be imputed to the other spouse, so those couples would indeed be eligible for the Home Buyer Tax Credit as long-time homeowners (assuming they otherwise qualify).
For the last few weeks, we’ve been promoting a campaign to fix the “Marriage Penalty” in the Home Buyer Tax Credit, which denies married couples a tax credit in situations where unmarried couples would get a credit in the same situation. To remind you, we’ve discovered four specific marriage penalties in the IRS application of the Home Buyer Tax Credit that would render a married couple ineligible, all of them situations where at least one partner in an unmarried couple would be able to claim the credit:
- Where one spouse qualifies as either a first-time home buyer or a long-time homeowner, but the other spouse does not qualify for either.
- Where one spouse qualifies as a first-time home buyer, but the other spouse qualifies as a long-time homeowner.
- Where both spouses qualify as long-time homeowners, but for different principal residences (i.e., they both lived in a home they owned for five consecutive years out of eight, but for different residences).
- Where a married couple has lived and owned in a home for five consecutive years out of the last eight, but only one spouse is on the title to the home.
In each of these situations, a married couple is apparently ineligible, according to IRS interpretations of the home buyer tax credit legislation. We’ve profiled some of those people, those who have written to us. If you are interested in the issue, or have a story to tell, you should post it to our comments section and join our Facebook Cause group. Continue reading